Loading...
Help others discover this article by sharing it
Check out more articles from the new technologies category
OpenAI is preparing to introduce ads into ChatGPT—but this move is less about greed and more about s...
Despite Apple Pay becoming one of the most widely adopted mobile payment systems in the world, Walmart still refuses to support it—a decision that continues to frustrate iPhone users and puzzle casual observers. The reason, however, is not technical inertia or oversight. Walmart’s stance is a deliberate, long-term strategic choice rooted in control over payments, customer data, fees, and ecosystem power.
Instead of Apple Pay, Walmart pushes customers toward its own payment ecosystem, including Walmart Pay and tightly integrated financial services offerings. This approach aligns with Walmart’s broader ambition to evolve from a retailer into a platform company—one that owns the customer relationship end-to-end, including how people pay.
The refusal has broader implications beyond checkout counters. It highlights growing tensions between Big Tech platforms and large retailers, exposes the economics behind digital payments, and signals a future where payment systems become competitive battlegrounds rather than neutral utilities. Understanding Walmart’s decision reveals far more about the future of commerce, data ownership, and platform dominance than a simple “yes or no” to Apple Pay ever could.
At first glance, mobile payments seem like a solved problem. Consumers want fast, secure, contactless payments. Apple Pay delivers exactly that. So why would the world’s largest retailer reject it?
Because payments are no longer just a transaction—they are a strategic choke point.
In modern retail, whoever controls the payment layer controls:
Customer data
Transaction fees
Loyalty integration
Behavioral insights
Future financial products
Apple Pay inserts Apple directly into that relationship. Walmart, by contrast, wants to own the entire funnel—from product discovery to checkout to post-purchase engagement.
Supporting Apple Pay would mean conceding strategic ground to Apple, a company that increasingly competes with retailers indirectly through services, hardware ecosystems, and consumer loyalty.
Walmart’s resistance to third-party payment platforms isn’t new.
In the early days of mobile wallets, Walmart joined efforts to create merchant-controlled payment systems.
Walmart Pay was launched to bypass traditional wallets and card networks where possible.
Over time, Walmart expanded into financial services: debit cards, BNPL-style offerings, money transfers, and even fintech partnerships.
This history shows a consistent pattern: Walmart does not want to be dependent on external platforms, especially those that extract fees and data.
Apple Pay represents the opposite philosophy—Apple as the trusted intermediary between banks, merchants, and consumers.
One of the most overlooked aspects of the Apple Pay debate is economics at Walmart’s scale.
Even small per-transaction costs matter when you process billions of payments annually.
Key considerations:
Apple Pay relies on existing card networks, which already charge interchange fees.
Apple reportedly takes a cut (directly or indirectly) from these transactions.
Walmart operates on razor-thin margins, especially in groceries.
For Walmart, supporting Apple Pay could mean:
Higher effective payment costs
Less leverage in negotiations with banks and networks
Increased dependency on Apple’s rules and roadmap
At Walmart’s scale, even fractions of a percentage point translate into hundreds of millions of dollars annually.
Apple famously positions itself as privacy-first, limiting data sharing with merchants. That’s good for consumers—but bad for retailers like Walmart.
Walmart wants:
Purchase-level insights
Cross-channel behavior tracking
Integration with loyalty programs
Data to fuel pricing, inventory, and personalization algorithms
Apple Pay deliberately obscures much of this data. Walmart Pay, by contrast, is fully integrated into Walmart’s data ecosystem.
From Walmart’s perspective, Apple Pay is not just a wallet—it’s a data firewall.
Apple Pay users face friction at checkout.
Some customers perceive Walmart as “behind the times.”
Others adapt by using physical cards or Walmart Pay.
Apple Pay offers superior privacy protections.
Walmart Pay requires deeper integration into Walmart’s ecosystem.
Walmart’s financial tools aim to reduce banking friction.
Apple Pay primarily benefits users already embedded in Apple’s ecosystem.
In short, the impact varies sharply depending on who you are.
Walmart’s stance sends a clear signal: retailers do not have to accept platform dominance passively.
This has encouraged:
Other retailers to invest in proprietary wallets
Increased scrutiny of Big Tech’s role in payments
A more fragmented payment landscape
Rather than converging on one universal payment standard, the industry is moving toward competing ecosystems.
Supports Apple Pay
Balances platform convenience with its own loyalty ecosystem
Accepts reduced control in exchange for smoother customer experience
Selective acceptance
Negotiates aggressively on fees
Uses Apple Pay strategically, not universally
Historically resisted Apple Pay
Focused on Amazon Pay and internal payment systems
Recently more open—but still cautious
Walmart stands out not because it’s alone, but because it is the most disciplined and consistent in its resistance.
Checkout inconvenience remains a real issue.
Younger consumers expect Apple Pay everywhere.
Walmart risks appearing outdated or hostile to consumer choice.
Tech-savvy shoppers may prefer retailers with broader payment support.
Consumers already juggle too many apps and wallets.
Walmart Pay adds another layer of complexity.
These criticisms are valid—but Walmart appears willing to accept them.
Industry analysts often describe Walmart’s approach as defensive—but rational.
From a strategic standpoint:
Walmart is protecting its margin structure.
It is resisting platform lock-in.
It is betting that scale gives it leverage consumers will tolerate.
The risk is not immediate—it’s long-term relevance if consumer behavior shifts faster than Walmart expects.
Continued frustration unless Walmart changes course.
Likely to use physical cards as a workaround.
Less impacted, especially those using Walmart Pay.
Often more flexible with payment methods.
Walmart’s stance gives cover to resist Apple Pay themselves.
But few have Walmart’s leverage.
Encouraged by Walmart’s push for alternatives.
See opportunity in retailer-led payment ecosystems.
The payments industry once promised simplicity. Instead, it’s becoming more fragmented:
Big Tech wallets (Apple, Google)
Retailer wallets (Walmart, Amazon)
Bank-led solutions
BNPL platforms
Crypto and alternative rails
Walmart’s refusal to support Apple Pay fits squarely into this trend: payments as strategy, not infrastructure.
Most likely in the near term.
Walmart Pay continues to expand.
Apple Pay remains unsupported.
Walmart accepts Apple Pay under negotiated terms.
Limited rollout or feature restrictions.
Less likely but possible if consumer pressure grows.
Governments push for payment neutrality.
Merchants may be required to support major wallets.
Long-term possibility, not imminent.
Walmart’s refusal to support Apple Pay is not stubbornness—it’s strategy.
It reflects:
A battle over data ownership
A fight against platform taxation
A belief in scale as leverage
A vision of retail as an integrated ecosystem
For consumers, it’s inconvenient.
For competitors, it’s instructive.
For the industry, it’s a warning: payments are the next great platform war.
Whether Walmart’s bet pays off will depend on how much friction consumers are willing to tolerate—and how aggressively Apple continues to push its ecosystem into everyday commerce.
One thing is certain: this decision tells us far more about the future of retail than it does about Apple Pay itself.
Apple’s foldable iPhone isn’t just another new device category—it represents a strategic inflection...
After nearly two decades, Google is finally loosening one of Gmail’s most rigid rules: your email ad...
